Casey Anthony In Cahoots With Nancy Grace?

Meet the modern Republican, folks! It votes for psuedo religious reasons. It gets manipulated by fake morals. It votes for people like Mitt Romney because he's white. It believes that Obama's Hawaiian birthplace was temporarily out of the country because he's black. It thinks that Jesus was an Anglo Saxon, just like the pictures of him in Methodist churches. It thinks that there is a resident evil, somewhere, named "Satan", who is responsible for all of it's shortcomings and character defects, absolving it of the duty to take responsibility for anything. Meet the modern Republican dumdum. And, oh....did I mention that one of those dumdums, in Pennsylvania, truly believes that Casey Anthony is not only in cahoots with Nancy Grace, but in league with the aforementioned Satan, and is plotting to kill her? That's right; Naomi Riches, of Pennsylvania thinks that Casey Anthony has been inducted into the Illuminati Hall of Fame, and that for some reason, not clearly outlined in the three billion dollar lawsuit she has filed against Anthony, Anthony has threatened to kill her and poison her drinking water! So much for Casey Anthony finally going away......it looks like she will get undue attention for the rest of her life. Why hasn't this lawsuit gone away? Does it really have merit?

It's hard to say which idea is more amusing: the notion that Nancy Grace is in cahoots with Casey Anthony, or the idea that an imaginary group of highly focused, very intelligent evil people who hate publicity and wish to remain secretive have recruited and initiated an attention seeking, undereducated, unfocused spoiled brat like Casey Anthony!  It's hard to remain in the shadows when your members have the paparazzi following them around! Also, who would have the grim responsibility of teaching young Casey the disciplines involved in the ways of evil? (I am only jesting, folks, don't get paranoid) Would that fall on some poor initiate who had somehow fallen into disfavor with the rest of the Illuminati? What a terrible punishment! Pray it never happens to you! Or to Nancy!

If Republicans want to focus on conspiracies, why can't they look at things that are actually happening, such as the fact checks on Mitt Romney's claims during the recent debate? Why not look at the Koch Brothers, and how their family has been buying elections and bankrolling conservative candidates for years? Why go with things that are complete nonsense?

 

D'Andre Lane Is Charged With Murder Of Bianca Jones

Surprise, surprise. Bianca Jones's father has been charged with the murder of his daughter, Bianca Jones. She disappeared in early December of 2011, and he reported a carjacking to explain why she went missing on his watch. He had another child, a fifteen year old, in the car with him during the road trip that culminated in the alleged carjacking, and his vehicle was found a few minutes later, (possibly where he parked it?) with Bianca's car seat but without Bianca. All this happened in Detroit, which is kind of a busy spot.....not the type of place one can carjack, pretend to get carjacked, or pretend to babysit, without the notice of other people; or, in legal parlance, eyewitnesses. The prosecuting attorney, Kym Worthy, followed up with all of the eyewitness accounts to events that happened on the morning Bianca was last seen, the best of whom were probably the cadaver dogs who picked up Bianca's scent in her car seat and in her father's home. She looked at all of D'Andre's conflicting statements, and she may have even looked at impromptu pictures garnered from traffic light camaras. And BRAVO, Ms. Worthy! D'Andre Lane is being held accountable for his daughter's disappearance.

Hopefully, this will set a new precedent, and speak to anyone else who would attempt to pull a "Casey Anthony" upon tiring of parenting responsibilities. Our culture needs updated mores concerning to safety of all of our children.

Bianca

Volunteer Search For Amir Jennings.

On Sunday, February 12, at 9:00 AM, volunteers will meet at the South Carolina Museum to search for Amir Jennings, who was last seen around Thanksgiving of 2011. This is good, as it is about time the general public took an interest in his missing persons case. His mother is still being held on a very high bond, but she has yet to cooperate with authorities and assist in locating her missing son. Can anyone say "Casey Anthony"?

You can read more about this event here. Amir was eighteen months old when he was last seen, and here is a picture of him. Hopefully, there will be some good news about him.

Seamus O'Riley's Unthinking Following

 

Anonymous said...

Juli Henry said... The jury was obviously thinking about the constitution in our country, the law, and the way our judicial system works. They were following instructions extreemly well under the circumstances, which inolved lots and lots of media, and they were listening very carefully for EVIDENCE, which was never presented. The case was WEAK from the start, folks, realize it! The duct tape on Caylee's face was only evidence that there was duct tape on Caylee's face. It may be "common sense" to ASSUME it was Casey, and I am reasonably sure it was, but ASSUMPTIONS cannot amount to EVIDENCE! Our justice system simply cannot work that way. Why won't the populace look at themselves and ask why the State of Florida, or "The People" didn't work harder to bring a stronger case? That's where the disconnect took place. It wasn't the Jury. They did what they were supposed to do. Casey played this game very strategically from a what appeared to be a losing position. Had the prosecuting attorneys and law enforcement played by the rules, a stonger case would have resulted. This should be a lesson to everyone about arrogence.....prosecuting attorneys thought they were better/smarter/more educated/ect. than Casey, went to court with a sloppily prepared case, thinking it would be slam-dunk, because they were "better" then she, and look...they lost. _________ So, the Prosecution lost its case, because it was suffering from a superiority complex? Wow, that would be hilarious, if it weren't so fantastical and sad. When I clicked on your username, your profile page on Blogger popped up. You describe yourself there as a "professional troublemaker". In addition, one of your two blogs is a homage to "Tarot" readings, an occult practice based on fantasy and a deck of cards. How fitting, though, that Killer's defense team, along with the jury, would be complemented by the above poster, since their shenanigans in court, and the resulting unjust verdict, were routed in fantastical thinking, too.

This was what another poster over at Seamus O'Riley Statement Analysis had to say to me about my opinion that the jury in the Casey Anthony trial simply did their job, to the best of their ability, doing the best they could with the CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence that was presented to them. I am just amazed at the number of people in this country who do not understand our justice system and how it works. Yes; it looks very much like Casey Anthony is guilty of murdering her daughter. It really does; but in order to convict, a jury needs more than just assumptions and circumstantial evidence. Could the prosecution have obtained it? Yes, I think so, if they had gone to the trouble. I really think the prosecuting attorney felt that he was smarter and better educated that Casey Anthony, and that he could wrap this whole case up without actually doing any work, especially if he made sure the media got everyone agitated. Unfortunately, for the prosecution, our justice system doesn't work that way. And.....just look at Project Innocence and it's statistics! Personal feelings, assumptions, and circumstantial evidence have sent many an innocent person to jail! Even with Casey Anthony walking, I do not want to turn back the clock to the Salem Witch trials and no DNA evidence. I truly love this country and I don't want the presumption of innocent until proven guilty to change. Sorry, anonomous poster who doesn't like me because of my tarot cards, troublemaking career, and opinion which differs from yours. You feel that my thinking is "fantastical"? Well........if you thought they jury on the Anthony trial could convict with no evidence, YOUR thinking was obviously more "fantastical" than mine ever could be. And I did not compliment the jury. I called out the prosecution on a weak case because I did not think they cared about the child who got killed.

Casey Anthony And The Court Of Public Opinion

In May, I posted about Camden Hughes, who was found in Maine, just outside of New Hampshire, deceased. I was horrified to learn that his mother had not only murdered him, but had actually planned the whole thing, travelling from Texas, where she would have gotton the death penalty for first degree murder, which it WAS, to crime tolerant New Hampshire, where people feel sorry for mommies who didn't realize that when we bring children into this world, we don't get to BE children anymore. Someone left a comment under that post that said "Poop". So........everyone wants to hang Casey Anthony, but it's truly fine to let Julianne McCreery get away with murder? The link to my post is http://siriunsun.blogspot.com/2011/05/second-degree-murder-children-and-new.html

So why do I get such an ignorant, negative response at the prospect of holding accountable a murderer against whom the people have EVIDENCE? Not only is there legally gotton statements from Camden Hughes's mother, there are witnesses to where she went with him, and there is camara footage. She was a danger to her child, and would be a danger to others. Why isn't it ok to want her locked up for the rest of her life? But someone thought they should comment "poop" under my post.

Then, there is the famous Casey Anthony. As we all know, by this time, she was aquitted of first degree murder. Before anyone judges me for what I am about to say, please know that I think she is guilty. I am not sure how little Caylee died, and that one, unclear point was probably a big problem for the jury, but I think Casey knows exactly how it happened and lied about it. It was up to the state of Florida to bring an airtight case against her and get her out of circulation for the rest of her life. They failed. Lack of evidence. But; does anyone really want a defendant in our courts to be guilty before proven innocent? I don't. We have enough problems with our justice system, from the way suspects are profiled, often wrongly, to the way evidence is mishandled and sometimes ignored. We don't need to undermine one of the biggest benefits we have in our criminal justice system.

One of the problems we have in the way justice is administered is that if a defendant presents as lower middle class to poor, the police will often assume that no one who matters will care about the person. They will also assume that the person is uneducated and untravled. They, and often prosecuting attorneys, will badger the defendant, throwing lies and circumstantial evidence in the defendant's face, swearing up and down that they KNOW a judge and jury will take the lies and circumstantial evidence seriously. That's how a lot of pleas are copped to crimes that the defendant didn't really commit, or that the defendant did not commit alone. Thus, justice does not actually get served. Casey lied, at times even pulling truly silly lies out of her ass, but didn't play the game the way most young and undereducated Florida defendants play it when law enforcement intimidates them. But the prosecution, in it's arrogance, went ahead and went to trial with a weak and circumstantial case. Now, because they thought they could get away with not doing thier jobs, a very dangerous person is free. Nice going, Florida. Even worse than New Hampshire.

Then, there is Carlos Rico, who dropped his four year old son off on the side of the road near Lubbock, Texas last week. He had choked the boy, and dumped him, thinking he was dead. But surprise! He wasn't dead! He got back up after daddy dearest thought he killed him and continued to live! But Texas went out and got daddy dearest, and charged him with attempted first degree murder. They have the vicitim's testimony, and forensic evidence. If this goes to court, I am reasonably sure they will get a guilty verdict. I really have to appreciate the message they send here: "If you wanna commit a crime, especially one against a child, don't do it in Texas". That's why Julianne McCreery went to New Hampshire.