What Story Did Terri Horman Tell Her Counsel?

Hey Bunchpants.....exactly what story did Terri Horman give you about what happened to Kyron, anyway? Because we know that in order to advise your client to plead the fifth, you have to know enough about the case and your client's involvement to honestly see that not testifying is a good idea for your client. If Kyron was taken by someone else, or if he was the victim of a terrible accident, and your client truly knows nothing about it, and it all comes out in the wash later, just by happenstance, it will also come out in the wash that Terri Horman had testimony that would NOT have jeopardized her in any way, and all this "pleading the fifth" will have been, legally, for nothing. It will also have been a move that has helped keep a little boy missing for over two years.

It's kinda, sorta like this: if Terri Horman were proclaiming lack of knowledge to her counsel, just like she did to the police, no one would ask for an abatement for Terri's personal response to the recent lawsuit filed against her by Kyron's mother. In fact, the lawsuit would probably never have been filed. If Peter Bunch were completely comfortable with his knowledge about Terri Horman's involvement with this case, he would have gone ahead and taken care of her divorce from Kaine Horman, Kyron's father. And this lawsuit would not be a problem. All Desiree Young actually wants from Terri Horman is her testimony. And if Kyron comes back alive, it will make all the difference in the world to her. So why is Bunchpants stalling? And what did Terri tell him?

Here's a question: if Terri murdered Kyron singlehandedly, would Bunchpants and Houzeboy understand the danger Terri presents to children and find a way to enter a plea? Or, if Terri sold Kyron, and got him involved with human trafficking, could either of those attorneys truly expect Terri to resist such criminal activity in the future? Probably not. And while they each have an obligation to defend their client, they also have an ethical obligation to report stuff like killing sprees and human trafficking. So what did Terri tell them about what happened to Kyron?

Perhaps Terri originally attempted to spin the whole disappearance as the fault of Kyron's mom, Desiree Young. Maybe she was planning to tell everyone that she thought Desiree had already picked Kyron up for the weekend. When it became clear that this was a story that would not work, as Desiree was already en route to Portland when she got the phone call concerning her son's disappearance, perhaps Terri told her lawyers that she thought Kyron was with a family friend, and that she thought the family friend would give Kyron back. One thing we know, at this point, is that whatever Terri Horman told the police, it was questionable enough to cause her failure of two polygraphs. Pleading the fifth is defeninately more advantageous from a legal standpoint than failing another polygraph or having one's testimony conflict with the testimony of someone who is telling the truth or having one's testimony conflict with fact.

It's probable that Terri Horman presented herself to both Bunchpants and Houzeboy as a victim. And if she testifies at all, she will probably play the victim card until the actually does go to jail for something. Even then, it will still probably be "all Kaine's fault", or the collective fault of all the people who want Kyron home safe.

If you know where this child is, please let law enforcement know.

Why Is Peter Bunchpants Seeking An Abatement?

Why doesn't Peter Bunch, representing Terri Horman in the lawsuit filed against her by Desiree Young, mother of missing Kyron Horman, want Terri Horman to simply go to court and tell Desiree whatever should should have told law enforcement two years ago, when Kyron initially disappeared in Portland, Oregon, and everyone was looking everywhere for him? What are his fears about just walking into the court room with his client, answering questions, testifying, and going home afterward, satisfied with our justice system and whatever decision it may yield? Here's what he had to say: “While one can sympathize with Young,” Horman’s attorney, Peter Bunch, wrote in the filing, “her lawsuit is, at its core, an attempt to circumvent established procedures for discovery in criminal proceedings and is an attack on Horman’s fundamental constitutional rights.”

Interesting. "While one can sympathize with Young".........as if Bunchpants really sympathized. (where's the eye-rolley when I need it?) "While one can really sympathize with Young"......we really need to stay focused on the importance of leaving Kyron lost........it's more important to go with the flow of the last two years.......we need to put the rights of a step parent first.........ect....ect.......ad infinitum, you can fill in whatever meaningless quote you might expect to come out his his mouth next.

Here's a little something about the law; if Terri Horman were a daycare provider or a babysitter, a parent could have sued her for "losing" Kyron a long time ago. And won. She would have lost her daycare providers' liscence and possibly would have been ordered to stay away from children. She would also have been tried in criminal court by now. Terri Horman has had it easy. There has been no accountability for her lack of responsibility for Kyron at all. There is really no reason for Peter Bunch's pants to be bunched up.

How about this, Bunchpants? "While one can sympathize with Young" it's very important to leave crime rings and their major players and pawns intact. If we hold those who interfere with custodial rights or commit other crimes against children responsible , family law attorneys who make lots of money off of such disagreements and defense attorneys who make lots of money off of criminals who harm children might not make as much money. Would that be the real reason your pants might be bunched up over this lawsuit, Bunchpants?